• Trang chủ
  • Bài viết nghiên cứu
  • FIRST-LINE GEMCITABINE–CISPLATIN FOR ADVANCED, RECURRENT, OR METASTATIC BILIARY TRACT CANCER: TREATMENT OUTCOMES AT HANOI ONCOLOGY HOSPITAL
Bài báo nghiên cứu gốc

FIRST-LINE GEMCITABINE–CISPLATIN FOR ADVANCED, RECURRENT, OR METASTATIC BILIARY TRACT CANCER: TREATMENT OUTCOMES AT HANOI ONCOLOGY HOSPITAL

.

https://doi.org/10.70755/vnjo.2026.82.17

Tóm tắt

.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of the Gemcitabine–Cisplatin regimen in patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic biliary tract cancer at Hanoi Oncology Hospital.

Subjects and methods: A retrospective and prospective research on patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic biliary tract cancer (including intrahepatic, extrahepatic, and gallbladder cancer) with ECOG PS 0–1, treated with at least 3 cycles of the Gemcitabine-Cisplatin regimen. The efficacy was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 and toxicity according to CTCAE version 5.0. Survival analysis using Kaplan–Meier and Log-rank verification.

Results: Sixty-five patients were enrolled with a mean age of 56.8 ± 10.1; men accounted for 66.2%. The most common tumor site is the intrahepatic biliary tract (66.2%). The majority of patients were in the recurrent or metastasis stage (64.6%). After 3 cycles, the disease control rate reached 83.1% with an objective response rate of 29.2%. After 6 cycles, the complete response rate was 2.6%, partial response accounted for 15.8%, stable disease for 57.9% and progressed disease for 23.7%. The disease control rate reached 76.3%. The median progression-free survival was 8.1 months (95% CI: 5.4–10.7), and the median overall survival was 13.1 months (95% CI: 8.2–18.0). Performance status (ECOG, PS) and response after 3 cycles were statistically significant prognostic factors for both progression-free survival and overall survival. Common grade 3–4 adverse effects were neutropenia (38.5%), elevated liver enzymes (15.4%), and anemia (10.8%).

Conclusion: Gemcitabine - Cisplatin is an effective and acceptable safety regimen. Response and performance status after 3 cycles (ECOG PS) are important prognostic factors, which are valuable to guide treatment decisions. This regimen could be the first-line chemotherapy option in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

Từ khóa

.

Keywords

Biliary tract cancer; Gemcitabine; Cisplatin; chemotherapy; survival; toxicity.

Tài liệu tham khảo (References)

  1. Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, et al. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(14):1273-1281. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0908721
  2. Ahn DH, Bekaii-Saab T. Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancers: a review. Onco Targets Ther. 2017; 10:515–526. doi:10.2147/OTT. S124400
  3. Oh DY, He AR, Qin S, et al. Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer (TOPAZ-1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022; 23(4):422–432. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00007-2
  4. Ioka T, Komatsu Y, Okusaka T, et al. Randomized phase III study of S-1 and cisplatin versus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer (JCOG1113, MITSUBA). J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40(4_suppl):378.
  5. Ninh Thi Thao (2021). Master's thesis in medicine. Hanoi Medical University.
Bài viết trước
CHANGES IN NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH OSTEOSARCOMA TREATED WITH THE MAP REGIMEN IN 2022–2024 AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS
Bài viết tiếp